Comparing the advantages and disadvantages of FDM vs SLA

No items found.

Posted on

25/6/2024

by

Editorial

How do the two most used technologies in 3D printing address production needs and when to choose one over the other?

Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) and Stereolithography (SLA) are the two most widely used 3D printing technologies, accounting for a majority of the 3D printers currently on the market. These range from a few hundred dollars for entry-level desktop systems, to a few hundred thousand dollars for the industrial systems. They are used by hobbyists and small businesses, and are also an integral part of many multi-million dollar companies’ product development and production lines.

Industries adopting these technologies range from aerospace and automotive to healthcare and consumer goods. In aerospace, FDM and SLA are used to create lightweight, complex components, with FDM being more suitable for applications requiring resistance to high stress and temperature variations. The automotive industry utilizes these technologies for rapid prototyping, custom parts, and even tooling. Both FDM and SLA are used in healthcare, although for very different applications, with SLA being used far more frequently, for higher impact applications than FDM. Consumer goods manufacturers leverage these technologies to design and prototype new products quickly - allowing for faster iteration and market readiness - and also more frequently for the end-products themselves.

FDM 3D printing

The FDM process involves extruding heated thermoplastic filaments through a nozzle. The nozzle moves along a predefined path laid out by the 3D model's digital file - depositing material layer by layer, with each layer solidifying before the next is added.

Compared to many other 3D printing technologies, low-medium level FDM systems are fairly cost accessible, and make use of a wide range of materials with specific properties such as heat resistance, flexibility, and strength. However, the cost of some top-tier industrial FDM systems is significantly higher. 

Common thermoplastics used in FDM include PLA (Polylactic Acid), ABS (Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene), PETG (Polyethylene Terephthalate Glycol), PEKK (Polyetherketoneketone), PA (Polyamide), Nylon, and various composite filaments that incorporate carbon fiber, wood, or metal particles. The technology is extensively used in prototyping, tooling, and small-scale manufacturing due to its accessibility, affordability, and ease-of-use.

However, the print resolution of FDM parts is lower compared to technologies like SLA. Due to the nature of the process, weak layer adhesion may potentially compromise the strength of the final part.

Applications

In the field of prototyping, FDM is invaluable for producing rapid, functional prototypes that allow for iterative design testing and validation. This is particularly beneficial in the automotive and aerospace industries, where prototypes can be tested for form, fit, and function before committing to full-scale production. In education, FDM printers are commonly used for teaching the principles of 3D printing and engineering, providing students with hands-on experience. The technology is also popular among hobbyists and makers for creating custom parts, artistic projects, and DIY solutions. Additionally, FDM is used in the manufacturing sector for producing jigs, fixtures, and tooling components that enhance production efficiency and reduce costs. The medical field also leverages FDM for creating custom prosthetics, orthotics, and anatomical models for surgical planning, although not for applications requiring high-levels of detail, due to the lower resolution of the printed parts.

Advantages:
  • Cost-effective
  • Wide range of materials
  • Easy to use and maintain
  • Ideal for rapid prototyping and functional parts
  • Accessible for a broad range of users
Disadvantages:
  • Lower print resolution
  • Requires support structures for overhanging features
  • Potential weak layer adhesion

SLA 3D printing

Stereolithography (SLA) was invented in the 1980s by Charles Hull, the co-founder of 3D Systems. It operates on a fundamentally different principle than FDM, using a process called vat photopolymerization. Often referred to as resin 3D printing, SLA directs a UV laser, or another light source, onto a vat of liquid photopolymer resin - selectively curing and solidifying the resin layer by layer according to the digital 3D model. As each layer is cured, the build platform raises incrementally, allowing the next layer of liquid resin to be solidified on top of the previous one.

SLA is renowned for its high precision and ability to produce intricate details and smooth surface finishes. This makes it an ideal choice for applications requiring fine detail and high resolution. SLA resins can be engineered to exhibit a wide range of properties, from flexible to extremely durable.

However, stereolithographic systems and the materials are comparatively more expensive than those of FDM, and the resins are messy to work with - often requiring dedicated hardware systems to remove and clean the parts. Automated resins cartridges address this issue but only to a certain degree. Resin material selection is constantly growing, with more durable resins now available that mimic the properties of thermoplastics.

Applications

In the jewelry industry, SLA is used to create highly detailed and delicate designs - enabling jewelers to produce complex patterns and prototypes with exceptional accuracy. The dental industry relies heavily on SLA for the production of custom dental models, aligners, and crowns benefiting from the technology’s ability to deliver precise and smooth surface finishes. In the medical field, SLA is crucial for creating anatomical models used in surgical planning and educational demonstrations - providing a clear and accurate representation of complex structures. The technology is also utilized in the production of hearing aids, where custom fit and precision are paramount. In the field of product design and development, SLA enables the creation of highly detailed prototypes that closely mimic the final product - facilitating more accurate design iterations and faster time-to-market.

Advantages:
  • High precision and fine details
  • Exceptional surface finish
  • Wide range of resin properties
Disadvantages:
  • Higher costs for machines and materials
  • Labor-intensive post-processing
  • Messy resin handling and cleanup

FDM or SLA?

When choosing between FDM and SLA, it is crucial to understand the key differences between the two 3D printing technologies to determine which best meets the specific project requirements.

Cost and accessibility

FDM is often the preferred choice when cost is a primary concern. Both FDM printers and the materials they use are generally more affordable compared to SLA. This makes FDM more accessible, especially for those looking to create functional prototypes or end-use parts without a significant financial investment. The lower cost of entry and material versatility also contribute to FDM's popularity in rapid prototyping, where quick and affordable iteration is desirable.

Ease of use and material versatility

FDM technology is known for its ease-of-use. The straightforward setup and operation of FDM printers make them suitable for a wide range of users, from beginners to seasoned professionals. Additionally, the versatility of materials available for FDM allows for a broad spectrum of applications. These materials can be selected based on the required mechanical properties, such as flexibility, strength, or heat resistance.

Precision and surface finish

SLA excels in areas where high precision and fine details are paramount - resulting in parts with qualities, such as exceptional surface finish, that FDM cannot match. This high level of detail makes SLA the technology of choice for applications requiring smooth surfaces and complex geometries. 

Application suitability

Ultimately, the choice between FDM and SLA should be guided by the specific demands of your project. If the focus is on cost-efficiency, ease-of-use, and material versatility, FDM is likely the better option, as it is well-suited for creating robust and functional parts quickly and affordably. On the other hand, if your project requires high precision, detailed features, and superior surface finish, and you can accommodate the higher costs, SLA will provide the quality and detail needed for high-end applications.

Get a quote

Get started and turn your ideas into reality

All uploads are secure and confidential